Simon looking earnest in Preveza, Greece

Lawyer to the Self-Represented (Ontario)

Legal Guides
tenant / small claims / welfare (ontario works) / odsp / human rights / employment / consumer /
collection agencies / criminal injuries compensation / sppa (admin law) / animal cruelty / dogs & cats / wild animal law (all Canada)

home / about / *NEW GUIDE IDEAS* / testimonials / Conditions of Use


... what's this?

Contracts - Damages - Remoteness

1298417 Ontario Ltd. v. Lakeshore (Town) (Ont CA, 2014)

In this case the Court of Appeal stated as follows on the issue of remoteness of damages on contract breach:
[138] In RBC Dominion Securities Inc. v. Merrill Lynch Canada Inc., 2008 SCC 54 (CanLII), [2008] 3 S.C.R. 79, at paras. 63-64, Abella J. (dissenting in part) summarized the test for remoteness of damages following a breach of contract:
The defining explanation of the contractual breach principles of reasonable foreseeability and remoteness is found in Hadley v. Baxendale... A court must therefore ask itself "what was in the reasonable contemplation of the parties at the time of contract formation" (Fidler v. Sun Life Assurance Co. of Canada, [2006] 2 S.C.R. 3, 2006 SCC 30 (CanLII), at para. 54).

The principle of remoteness "imposes on damage awards reasonable limits which are required by fairness" (Matheson (D.W.) & Sons Contracting Ltd. v. Canada (Attorney General) (2000), 187 N.S.R. (2d) 62, 2000 NSCA 44 (CanLII), at para. 69, per Cromwell J.A.). It aims "to prevent unfair surprise to the defendant, to ensure a fair allocation of the risks of the transaction, and to avoid any overly chilling effects on useful activities by the threat of unlimited liability" (Jamie Cassels and Elizabeth Adjin-Tettey, Remedies: The Law of Damages (2nd ed. 2008), at p. 352). This principle will be informed by the nature and culture of the business in question, and the particular contractual relationship between the parties... [Emphasis added.]
[139] In Angela Swan and Jakub Adamski, Canadian Contract Law, 3d ed. (Markham, Ontario: LexisNexis Canada, 2012), at p. 480, the authors’ helpfully frame the issue as “the determination of the extent of the risk that a promisor assumes when he makes a promise.”

Law Society Number #37308N / Website © Simon Shields 2005-2019