Simon's Megalomaniacal Legal Resources

(Ontario/Canada)

EVIDENCE | ADMINISTRATIVE LAW | SPPA / Fairness (Administrative)
SMALL CLAIMS / CIVIL LITIGATION / CIVIL APPEALS / JUDICIAL REVIEW / Something Big

Home / About / Democracy, Law and Duty / Testimonials / Conditions of Use

Civil and Administrative
Litigation Opinions
for Self-Reppers


TOPICS

(What's a Topic?)




Murray v. Kubota Canada Ltd.




Between
Murray, and
Kubota Canada



Court File No. 99/99



Ontario Superior Court of Justice
Divisional Court - Toronto, Ontario

Dunnet, J. Macdonald and Sedgwick JJ.

February 5, 2001.






Counsel:

No counsel mentioned.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



?????The judgment of the Court was delivered by

1 ????DUNNET J. (endorsement):-- This appeal is dismissed with costs fixed at
$750 and payable, if demanded.

2 ????On the evidence before her, the Trial Judge did not err in deducting from
the award the amounts received in respect of her claims for long term disability
benefits.

3 ????There was no evidence of bad faith discharge. Accordingly there is no
reason to interfere with the trial judge's determination of the appropriate
notice period.

DUNNET J.

CC0

The author has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this Isthatlegal.ca webpage.




Last modified: 23-02-19
By: admin