In Canada (Attorney General) v. Ibrahim (Fed CA, 2023) the Federal Court of Appeal considered a Crown JR of a decision by the Social Security Tribunal (Appeal Division) that upheld the respondent's eligibility for a CPP-disability pension.
In this quote the court considers the SOR for challenging fact findings in a JR:
[16] Factual findings made by the decision-maker are owed deference and will not be interfered with, absent exceptional circumstances (Vavilov at paras. 125-126; Mason at para. 73).
The author has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this Isthatlegal.ca webpage.
