Simon's Legal Resources

(Ontario/Canada)

EVIDENCE | ADMINISTRATIVE LAW | SPPA / Fairness (Administrative)
SMALL CLAIMS / CIVIL LITIGATION / CIVIL APPEALS / JUDICIAL REVIEW / Something Big

Home / About / Democracy, Law and Duty / Testimonials / Conditions of Use

Help Isthatlegal Grow


TOPICS

(What's a Topic?)


Estoppel, Res Judicata and Stare Decisis


COMMENT

'Estoppel' refers to a party being barred from asserting a claimed right because of them having elected, either directly or implicitly, a past position inconsistent with that now-claimed right. Such a 'position' may be taken or made by statement, action - or even inaction. For example, you may be 'estopped' from arguing interpretation A of a contract, when you have relied on the contrary position B for the last year.

In Ryan v. Moore (SCC, 2005) the Supreme Court of Canada lists the six recognized types of estoppel:
52 The jurisprudence discloses six types of estoppel: estoppel by representation of fact, proprietary estoppel, promissory estoppel, estoppel by convention, estoppel by deed and estoppel by negligence (see Bower, at pp. 3-9). ...
Res judicata and stare decisis are similar only they are more authoritative, since the accepted position is 'officially'-endorsed - ie. having resulted from a past legal ruling (res judicata) or from established legal principle (stare decisis). Stare decisis comes in at least two types - 'vertical' and 'horizontal'!.

What all of these doctrines share is that they operate to block arguing against something that is already established - either factually, legally - or both.



CASES


ESTOPPEL

Estoppel - General

Estoppel - Estoppel And Public Authorities

Issue Estoppel

Estoppel - Issue Estoppel (+)
Estoppel - Issue Estoppel within Summary Judgment
Estoppel - Issue Estoppel and Criminal Law (+)
Estoppel - Issue Estoppel - Final versus Interlocutory Orders
Estoppel - Issue Estoppel - Settlement
Estoppel - Issue Estoppel - Administrative

Cause of Action Estoppel

Estoppel - Cause of Action Estoppel (+)
Estoppel - Cause of Action Estoppel - 'Intimate Partner Violence' (IPV) Exception

Promissory Estoppel

Estoppel - Promissory Estoppel (+)

Proprietary Estoppel

Estoppel - Proprietary Estoppel

Estoppel by Representation

Estoppel - Estoppel by Representation

Estoppel by Convention

Estoppel - Estoppel by Convention


RES JUDICATA

Res Judicata

Res Judicata - General (+)
Res Judicata - Reconsideration
Res Judicata - Discretionary


STARE DECISIS

Stare Decisis

Stare Decisis - General | Part 2
Stare Decisis - Obiter Dicta
Stare Decisis - Judicial Comity
Stare Decisis - Reconsiderations
Stare Decisis - Horizontal (+)
Stare Decisis - 'Reasonable Hypotheticals' Charter Doctrine
Stare Decisis - International Authorities as Precedents
Stare Decisis - Charter
Administrative Stare Decisis [LINK /administrative]
Stare Decisis - Interlocutory Orders
Stare Decisis - Federal Court
Stare Decisis - Per Incuriam

Reconsidering Precedent (Stare Decisis)

VAVILOV - Stare Decisis - Reconsidering Precedent
Stare Decisis - Reconsidering Precedent (+)



EDIT NOTES
. see Ryan v. Moore, 2005 SCC 38 (CanLII), [2005] 2 SCR 53

CC0

Unless authorship is otherwise stated or obvious from the context, all
written materials in this website were created by Simon Shields, who
waives all of his copyright and related or neighboring rights to this
Isthatlegal.ca webpage. Note in particular that this waiver only applies to
Simon's material, as copyright in statutory/regulatory materials and
case extracts were never his to give away.




Last modified: 21-05-26
By: admin