Simon's Legal Resources

(Ontario/Canada)

EVIDENCE | ADMINISTRATIVE LAW | SPPA / Fairness (Administrative)
SMALL CLAIMS / CIVIL LITIGATION / CIVIL APPEALS / JUDICIAL REVIEW / Something Big

Home / About / Democracy, Law and Duty / Testimonials / Conditions of Use

Civil and Administrative
Litigation Opinions
for Self-Reppers


TOPICS

(What's a Topic?)


Paramountcy


COMMENT

'Paramountcy' is the issue of resolving 'who rules' when different jurisdictional levels of law conflict. It can occur between any of the three different levels of government: municipal, provincial and federal - and even between laws at the same level. Current case law holds that the tests for municipal-provincial conflicts, and provincial-federal conflict, are the same - and both are quite tolerant of legislative co-existence. The old 'occupying the field' doctrine is dead - unless the dominant jurisdiction declares exclusivity. Current 'paramountcy' law grows from the Hudson (SCC, 2001) case, and finds it's essential statement in Croplife (Ont CA, 2005).


CASES

Paramountcy - Hudson (SCC, 2001)
Paramountcy - Croplife (Ont CA, 2005)
Paramountcy - Post-Croplife Cases (+)
Paramountcy - Conflict
Paramountcy - Municipal

Paramountcy - Federal
Paramountcy - Conflict and Same Level of Government


CC0

Unless authorship is otherwise stated or obvious from the context, all
written materials in this website were created by Simon Shields, who
waives all of his copyright and related or neighboring rights to this
Isthatlegal.ca webpage. Note in particular that this waiver only applies to
Simon's material, as copyright in statutory/regulatory materials and
case extracts were never his to give away.




Last modified: 04-02-25
By: admin