Rarotonga, 2010

Simon's Legal Resources

(Ontario)

LEGAL GUIDES
ADMINISTRATIVE LAW | SPPA / SMALL CLAIMS / CIVIL COURT / CIVIL APPEALS / JUDICIAL REVIEW
Contracts / Torts / Evidence / Limitations / Tenant Plus / welfare (ontario works) / odsp / human rights / employment / consumer / E-Access / Collection Agencies / CRB / CICB / Fairness (Administrative) / Retirement Homes / Social Housing / War

home / about / Democracy, Law and Duty / testimonials / Donate law books! / Conditions of Use

Associated Site
Canadian Animal Law

TOPICS

Executive Government (Ontario)

This is an Order in Council posted on the Ontario Gazette after the 2022 provincial election. It sets out the statutes that each Minister is responsible for, and other interesting delegations of authority.

Order in Council 1185/2022.

. Metropolitan Preparatory Academy Inc v. Ontario

In Metropolitan Preparatory Academy Inc v. Ontario (Div Court, 2022) the Divisional Court held that cabinet financial allocation decisions were non-justiciable, here in a judicial review context:
[19] Policy considerations at Cabinet are not reviewable in this court absent jurisdictional error, a constitutional challenge, bad faith or irrationality: Dixon v. Canada (Governor in Council), 1997 CanLII 6145 (CAF), [1997] 3 FC 169, para. 17 (CA); Thorne’s Hardware Ltd. v. R., 1983 CanLII 20 (SCC), [1983] 1 SCR 106, para. 9; Ontario Federation of Anglers and Hunters v. Ontario (2002) 2002 CanLII 41606 (ON CA), 211 DLR (4th) 741 (Ont. CA); Brazeau v. Canada (Attorney General), 2020 ONCA 184, para. 61; Mackin v. New Brunswick (Minister of Finance); Rice v. New Brunswick, 2002 SCC 61, paras. 25-26.
. Metropolitan Preparatory Academy Inc v. Ontario

In Metropolitan Preparatory Academy Inc v. Ontario (Div Court, 2022) the Divisional Court held that government financial/policy allocation decisions were non-justiciable, here in an Ontario judicial review context:
[18] “[R]esponsibility for the management of public funds rests with the government and not the court…” (Bowman v. Her Majesty the Queen, 2019 ONSC 1064, para. 40). Expenditures of public funds are discretionary public policy decisions made by government pursuant to the Crown’s common law spending powers: Pharmaceutical Manufacturers Association of Canada v. British Columbia (Attorney General) (1997), 1997 CanLII 4597 (BC CA), 149 DLR (4th) 613, paras. 27-29 (BC CA).

....

[28] Finally, we note that the applicants and their employees were eligible to seek funding under several programs targeted at businesses and as support for working people to relieve some financial consequences of public health measures taken in response to COVID-19. There is no unfairness in Ontario taking different approaches to addressing issues arising in the private sector and issues arising in publicly funded institutions.


CC0

The author has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this Isthatlegal.ca webpage.