Rarotonga, 2010

Simon's Megalomaniacal Legal Resources

(Ontario/Canada)

ADMINISTRATIVE LAW | SPPA / Fairness (Administrative)
SMALL CLAIMS / CIVIL LITIGATION / CIVIL APPEALS / JUDICIAL REVIEW / Practice Directives / Civil Portals

home / about / Democracy, Law and Duty / testimonials / Conditions of Use

Civil and Administrative
Litigation Opinions
for Self-Reppers


TOPICS


Police - Police Services Act (PSA) - General

. Grus v. Renwick and Chief of Police, Ottawa Police Service

In Grus v. Renwick and Chief of Police, Ottawa Police Service (Div Court, 2023) the Divisional Court (single judge) lists some Police Services Act (PSA) provisions regarding police disciplinary hearings:
[3] Constable Grus is charged with one count of discreditable conduct under the PSA.

[4] Section 94 of the PSA allows the Chief of Police to designate a hearing officer. In this case, the OPS Chief of Police designated retired superintendent Christopher Renwick as the hearing officer.

[5] Section 83 of the PSA sets out the rules for hearings under Part V of the legislation. Where the statute is silent, s. 83(1) of the PSA states that disciplinary proceedings for police officers are to be conducted in accordance with the Statutory Powers Procedure Act [2] (“SPPA”).

[6] Section 87 of the PSA provides an automatic right of appeal to the Ontario Civilian Police Commission (“Commission”) from the decision of the hearing officer.

[7] Section 88 of the PSA provides a limited right of appeal to the Divisional Court within 30 days of receiving notice of the Commission’s decision.

[8] Neither the PSA nor the SPPA provides a mechanism to challenge interlocutory decisions of a hearing officer. An appeal to the Commission is only from a final decision of the hearing officer.




CC0

The author has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this Isthatlegal.ca webpage.




Last modified: 05-01-24
By: admin