In the alternative, the appellants submit that the trial judge’s interpretation of the MOU results in an illegal agreement, because it would entail payment for “extra billing” for an insured health service rendered to an insured person, which is proscribed by the Canada Health Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. C-6 at ss. 18-21; see also Ontario’s Commitment to the Future of Medicare Act, 2004, S.O. 2004, c. 5, at s. 10.
The author has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this Isthatlegal.ca webpage.