Rarotonga, 2010

Simon's Megalomaniacal Legal Resources

(Ontario/Canada)

EVIDENCE | ADMINISTRATIVE LAW | SPPA / Fairness (Administrative)
SMALL CLAIMS / CIVIL LITIGATION / CIVIL APPEALS / JUDICIAL REVIEW / Practice Directives / Civil Portals

Home / About / Democracy, Law and Duty / Testimonials / Conditions of Use

Civil and Administrative
Litigation Opinions
for Self-Reppers

Simon's Favourite Charity -
Little Friends Lefkada (Greece)
Cat and Dog Rescue


TOPICS


Small Claims - Default Proceedings

. Mulders v. Baggia

In Mulders v. Baggia (Div Ct, 2025) the Divisional Court dismissed a motion to extend time to commence a Small Claims appeal, here where appeal was sought from a dismissal of a set aside motion against a default order:[Rules of the Small Claims Court: R11.06]:
[34] The motion judge’s decision to either dismiss or grant a motion to set aside default is discretionary: r. 11.06, Rules of the Small Claims Court. It is not the role of an appellate court to replace the motion judge’s exercise of that discretion. An appellate court should only intervene where the motion judge’s discretion was exercised on a wrong principle of law or a clear error was made: Laredo Construction Inc. v. Sinnadurai, 2005 CanLII 46934 (ON CA); Bottran v. Vroom, 2002 CanLII 41691 (ON CA).



CC0

The author has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this Isthatlegal.ca webpage.




Last modified: 29-05-25
By: admin