Rarotonga, 2010

Simon's Megalomaniacal Legal Resources

(Ontario/Canada)

EVIDENCE | ADMINISTRATIVE LAW | SPPA / Fairness (Administrative)
SMALL CLAIMS / CIVIL LITIGATION / CIVIL APPEALS / JUDICIAL REVIEW / Something Big / Practice Directives / Civil Portals

Home / About / Democracy, Law and Duty / Testimonials / Conditions of Use

Civil and Administrative
Litigation Opinions
for Self-Reppers

Simon's Favourite Charity -
Little Friends Lefkada (Greece)
Cat and Dog Rescue


TOPICS


Statutory Interpretation - "Hold"

. Grenon v. Canada

In Grenon v. Canada (Fed CA, 2025) the Federal Court of Appeal considered the specific statutory interpretation of the term "hold":
[145] Before I examine other uses of "“hold”" in the Income Tax Act and Regulations, I acknowledge that "“hold”" has many possible meanings. However, I am satisfied that, in the context of the Income Tax Act, "“hold”" is intended to mean "“own”", unless the context in which it is used indicates otherwise. I see nothing in Regulation 4801 that suggests hold is not intended to mean own. To the contrary, as noted in paragraph 161 below, the prescribed conditions were once expressly described as concerning dispersal of ownership.



CC0

The author has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this Isthatlegal.ca webpage.




Last modified: 09-07-25
By: admin