Rarotonga, 2010

Simon's Megalomaniacal Legal Resources

(Ontario/Canada)

EVIDENCE | ADMINISTRATIVE LAW | SPPA / Fairness (Administrative)
SMALL CLAIMS / CIVIL LITIGATION / CIVIL APPEALS / JUDICIAL REVIEW / Something Big

Home / About / Democracy, Law and Duty / Testimonials / Conditions of Use

Civil and Administrative
Litigation Opinions
for Self-Reppers


TOPICS

(What's a Topic?)


Torts - Negligence - Appeals

. Ward v. Landmark Inn Leasing Corp. et al.

In Ward v. Landmark Inn Leasing Corp. et al. (Ont Div Ct, 2025) the Ontario Divisional Court dismissed a plaintiff's appeal, this from a Small Claims settlement contract case.

Here the court considers the appellate SOR for some issues of negligence:
[32] With respect to issues involving the determination of negligence, identifying a duty of care and its breach invites a standard of correctness. On the other hand, applying the facts to the arguments of negligence requires a palpable and overriding error before the appeal can succeed. Unless an erroneous finding of negligence rests on an incorrect statement of the legal standard, requiring a standard of palpable and overriding error for findings of negligence reinforces the proper relationship between appellate and trial courts: see Housen, at paras. 30-31.


CC0

The author has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this Isthatlegal.ca webpage.




Last modified: 26-09-25
By: admin